founder-built
Medicine, computation, and biology in one founding team.
A physician-computer scientist and a computational biologist met at Carnegie Mellon and built Galen's virtual-cell core together.
Most of the field models snapshots of biology.Galen models its trajectory over time.
Galen’s virtual cell predicts how real cells change over time in response to genetic, chemical, or environmental interventions.
Review the evidence, real-T-cell proof plan, and milestones with the founders.
the pre-seed opportunity
01 | wedge
Engineered T cells can lose function under repeated tumor pressure. Only a fraction of candidate changes can receive full real-cell testing.
02 | product
Cell-therapy R&D leaders use Galen to decide which candidate changes deserve assays. Programs return a ranked shortlist, uncertainty, a locked scoring plan, and an evidence certificate for $150K to $750K.
03 | proof today
Cell-state recognition and calibrated uncertainty are benchmarked on held-out real human-cell states; intervention dynamics in controlled simulation. All three form the computational core.
04 | proof next
Before a real T-cell screen, Galen locks the ranking, comparator, and scoring rule. Success means outperforming the agreed reference at identifying interventions that preserve durable function under repeated challenge.
05 | round
Raising $2M over 18 months to sign the first biopharma program, score the real-T-cell comparison, and repeat. Meeting investors through August 2026.
why Galen can win
founder-built
A physician-computer scientist and a computational biologist met at Carnegie Mellon and built Galen's virtual-cell core together.
why now
Time-aware single-cell and perturbation measurements now support model-guided experiments, while cell-therapy teams already fund persistence and construct-optimization decisions.
defensibility
Galen owns the prediction, ranking, evidence contract, and scored decision product. Returned measurements sharpen the next queue under agreed data frameworks.
expansion
A $150K to $750K entry program can expand into $1M to $3M in recurring annual cycles per therapeutic asset, then into multi-program relationships after transfer is demonstrated.
the technical thesis
Most of the field builds better descriptions of a cell at a moment in time. Galen models what a cell does when you change it. Those are different mathematical objects.
Atlases and cell foundation models are trained on observation. They learn what varies with what, which is correlation. But correlation does not imply causation. Forecasting an intervention that has never been tried is a causal question, and no amount of observational data answers it.
what Galen does instead
A virtual cell usually predicts a snapshot: the state a cell lands in after a change, learned from changes already observed. Galen predicts the trajectory. It learns the rules that carry a starting state forward, then treats an intervention as an operation on those rules rather than as another input. The prediction continues after the intervention stops. That is where a durable effect separates from a temporary one.
what the field builds
Organize and represent the biology that has already been measured.
what therapeutics need
Forecast the outcome of a change nobody has run yet, and rank it against the alternatives.
Because the intervention is part of the model, Galen can rank changes it has never seen. Each prediction is held to a locked scoring rule, and the returned measurement sharpens the next.
why virtual cells
Cells are where disease takes hold and medicine takes effect. A virtual cell is software that predicts how a real one behaves. Give it a starting state and a proposed intervention, such as a drug or a gene edit, and it forecasts how that cell changes over time.
Virtual cells will let scientists test more ideas in software, spend scarce experiments on the strongest candidates, and reach a working therapy sooner.
01 | measure
Define the cell's starting state and the candidate interventions.
02 | forecast
Predict how the cell changes under repeated biological pressure.
03 | rank
Prioritize candidates and report uncertainty.
04 | test and learn
Test the locked shortlist in the lab; returned measurements score the result and improve the next cycle.
A model of life must remain answerable to actual wet lab biology. Real cell biology experiments score the virtual cell predictions and determine the next tests.
The broader virtual-cell platform will be built one valuable, measurable, repeatable decision at a time. Galen begins with T-cells, specifically tackling the challenge of durability and exhaustion in engineered cell therapies.
the founders
A physician-computer scientist and a computational biologist designed and built Galen's computational core together.
Co-founder and CEO
Logan is a physician and former Harvard Medical School clinical-AI researcher trained in computer science at Carnegie Mellon. He leads clinical judgment, causal evaluation, and product direction.
Co-founder and CTO
Kushagra is a computational biologist trained at IIIT Hyderabad and Carnegie Mellon. He leads model architecture, biological data systems, and scientific software.
the opening
Measurement, method, and budget have arrived at the same time. Galen enters that opening with its computational core already built.
measurement
Perturbation and single-cell assays now provide time-aware inputs for model-guided experiments.
technical opening
Galen is that layer. It predicts change, quantifies uncertainty, and improves the next decision.
buyer readiness
Persistence, construct optimization, and experimental prioritization already sit inside therapeutic R&D budgets.
Cell maps organize observed biology. Laboratories measure what happened. Galen ranks, locks, and scores the next experimental decision.
the value at stake
$343 billion a year
About 90% of drugs entering the clinic fail, and preclinical attrition from hit to candidate exceeds 90%. The average cost per approved drug reaches roughly $2.5 billion because every failure is absorbed by the one candidate that works.
Galen ranks those candidates before the spend commits.
the beachhead
Scientists engineer immune cells to recognize cancer, manufacture them as a therapy, and deliver them to the patient. Under repeated tumor pressure, those cells can become exhausted and lose their cancer-fighting function.
Durability is an urgent and expensive design problem for immuno-oncology. Every weak experiment consumes scarce cells, time, and assay budget. Galen concentrates that investment on the candidates with the strongest predicted durability.
Teams prioritize with prior assays, scientific judgment, internal analysis, and partial screens. Galen ranks the candidates before scarce experimental capacity is spent.
why this starting point
T-cell durability combines an existing development budget, a repeated-challenge endpoint, and a search space that rewards predictive prioritization.
01 | valuable
Galen enters an existing therapeutic-development budget.
02 | measurable
Durable function creates a clear product endpoint.
03 | strategic
Each program leaves the model stronger for the next one.
the product
A production decision system for therapeutic R&D teams, combining predictive software with a locked evidence workflow.
the deliverable
Galen delivers ranked candidates, confidence estimates, a locked screen and scoring plan, an evidence certificate, and the next measurement queue.
01
T-cell context, genes and receptor designs, combinations, culture conditions, prior measurements, and assay budget.
02
Predicted repeated-challenge trajectories, uncertainty, and a ranked shortlist.
03
Candidates, comparator, measurements, and scoring rule fixed before results exist.
04
Returned measurements produce a scored result, evidence certificate, and next queue.
evidence certificate
An auditable record of what Galen predicted, what was tested, how the result was scored, and what should be measured next.
business model
The program fee covers model setup, ranking, uncertainty, prospective scoring, and returned-result analysis. Real-cell execution is scoped with the program, so Galen carries software economics and no laboratory capital cost.
Initial program
$150K to $750K
One candidate library, ranked and scored across an agreed number of measurement cycles.
Program scope sets the range: candidate-library size and the number of ranking-and-measurement cycles.
Asset expansion
$1M to $3M annually
The same intervention workflow guides successive decisions across one cell-therapy program.
Platform expansion
$3M to $10M annually
Platform access extends the workflow across programs, teams, and intervention libraries.
Partnered programs
Milestone economics
Galen participates in the value of the assets its scored rankings shape.
current proof
Ranking an intervention rests on three capabilities: reading where a cell starts, forecasting where a change takes it, and knowing when that forecast can be trusted. Any one alone produces a description; together they produce a decision. Galen runs all three as one system. Each is benchmarked below.
01 | Real human cell state recognition
98.9%
On held-out real human cells, Galen accurately recognized the cell state it was given.
A virtual cell must begin from the right biological state before it can forecast what happens next.
Known-lineage recognition on held-out cells; about 72% for the matched linear reference
02 | Controlled simulated benchmark
0.03 versus 0.82
With intervention response withheld, Galen finishes 0.03 from the hidden target versus 0.82 for the matched simpler mechanism. Lower is better.
In a controlled simulation, Galen preserved the difference between a durable state change and a temporary push, central to predicting whether engineered function will persist.
Lower is better; 0.82 distance for the matched simpler mechanism
03 | Real human cell state calibration
90% target met
Galen's uncertainty intervals achieve their stated 90% coverage target on held-out human-cell states.
Calibrated uncertainty separates confident rankings from the candidates that need more measurement.
90% interval-coverage target achieved on held-out human-cell states
04 | pre-seed milestone
Locked real-cell screen
Galen commits the ranking, comparator, and scoring rule before the screen runs, then scores the result against returned measurements.
Agreed reference defined before results exist
The core components are built, benchmarked, and integrated. The pre-seed puts them to work inside biopharma T-cell programs.
the market
Virtual-cell leadership will belong to the system researchers trust to choose what happens next. Galen's revenue architecture climbs from focused entry programs to development partnerships in the therapies it shapes.
01 / deploy
pre-seedwhat it proves
Score a prospectively locked ranking for durable function through repeated challenge.
what it unlocks
First $25M to $100M of ARR
100 to 200 qualified accounts × $250K to $500K annually
02 / repeat
pre-seedwhat it proves
Reuse the workflow across successive intervention decisions in a therapeutic program.
what it unlocks
That ARR becomes recurring
03 / transfer
what it proves
Demonstrate that the core workflow transfers without rebuilding the intervention engine.
what it unlocks
Proves the platform thesis
04 / expand
what it proves
Extend the shared engine across programs, teams, and intervention libraries.
what it unlocks
$318M to $636M annually
424 developers × $750K to $1.5M annually
05 / platform
what it proves
Build a shared foundation for intervention applications across biological contexts.
what it unlocks
$1B to $3B annually
Eligible programs × decision cycles × annual intervention, assay, optimization, and process-development spend
06 / partner
what it proves
Run scored rankings inside partner programs and share in the assets they shape.
what it unlocks
Milestone economics per asset
114 AI-discovery partnerships signed in 2025 for $43.4B in potential payments; single platform deals now clear $2.5B
Source: AI discovery partnership volume, 2025Source: Single-deal benchmark, 2026Each layer is a distinct economic surface with its own unlock. Galen's monetization begins with qualified T-cell accounts and current program pricing, then climbs as scored rankings earn a share of the assets they shape.
The wedge creates a reachable first business. Repeatability, transfer, and partnered economics create the asymmetric upside across software, therapeutic development, and the capital directed toward biological R&D.
the pre-seed
Three gates retire the three risks in order: will anyone pay, does it work, does it compound. Galen advances technical, experimental, and commercial work in parallel, moving as each gate clears.
SIGN
Work
Integrate wet lab execution, secure the first biopharma program, and lock the comparator, scoring plan, and measurement-return contract before any work begins.
Evidence unlocked
A signed program with the reference and the scoring rule agreed in advance.
Customer + company value
A named partner, contracted program revenue, and a candidate library to rank.
SCORE
Work
Rank the program's candidate library, run the locked screen through repeated challenge, and score the returned measurements against the agreed reference.
Evidence unlocked
A locked real-T-cell ranking scored against the agreed reference on durable function.
Customer + company value
A decision-ready result, evidence certificate, and next experimental queue.
REPEAT
Work
Use the returned measurements to update the model, rank the next queue, and complete a second cycle inside the same program.
Evidence unlocked
A second scored cycle that improves on the first.
Customer + company value
A repeatable customer product packaged for recurring use within a therapeutic asset.
capital advances
the outcome
The pre-seed turns a signed program into a scored result and a second cycle that improves on it. Transfer into a second biological context is the seed milestone.
founder discussion
Request a direct conversation to explore the company, review private round materials, and discuss participating in the round.
Raising $2M. Meeting investors through August 2026.